Sunday, October 8, 2006
Thursday, August 17, 2006
Happy Birthday Dear Basi
Friday, June 23, 2006
some days, I can totally relate

A Few Things Lawmakers Can Agree On
Official state species include, from left, pink spotted ladybug (insect), snapping turtle (reptile) and striped bass (saltwater fish).
ALBANY, June 22 — Property taxes are soaring and upstaters are fleeing New York. But lawmakers decided that they had to tackle the ladybug question first.
The state’s official insect, a nine-spotted ladybug, would no longer fly in that role: it is extinct in New York State. So legislators took a break from bickering over health care spending and property taxes in the waning days of the session and found common ground on the issue of designating a new state insect, making it the pink spotted ladybug instead.
They passed other laws, too: The snapping turtle would become the state’s official reptile. And the striped bass would henceforth become the state’s official saltwater fish.
The rush to designate official state critters came amid a crush of activity as lawmakers put aside some more pressing problems, but it showed how things often get done in Albany. The sponsor of the ladybug bill, for instance, did not know it had a chance until it suddenly came to the floor for a vote.
Why? Because she is a Republican in the Democratic-controlled State Assembly, and members of the minority party often find it impossible to get their bills passed.
But pass it did, almost unanimously — though a few members did not vote. It must also be acted on by the Senate.
“I know it’s not earth-shattering,” said the assemblywoman, Nancy Calhoun, who represents parts of Orange and Rockland Counties.
Ms. Calhoun says she was just trying to right a wrong. Lawmakers first adopted the state’s official bug in 1989, but the nine-spotted ladybug had already become extinct in the state. Ms. Calhoun was alerted to the error by a reporter a couple of years ago and she submitted a bill to rectify the matter.
“Why do we want to get something like this wrong?” Ms. Calhoun said. “It would be like having a dinosaur as our state reptile.”
On the reptile front, Assemblyman Jeffery Dinowitz, a Democrat from the Bronx, came to the rescue.
Mr. Dinowitz said the bill to make the snapping turtle the official state reptile was the result of a competitive process — an election among elementary school students. Mr. Dinowitz acknowledged having his doubts about sponsoring the legislation.
“I said this was goofy and I didn’t really want to end up in the newspaper talking about this kind of thing at the end of session,” Mr. Dinowitz said, as he sat at his desk on Thursday, talking about this kind of thing to a reporter. And besides, he noted, the state already had an official muffin, so why not a state turtle?
So why does this kind of bill always come at the end of the session?
“Don’t ask me that, please,” he said.
Sunday, May 21, 2006
The Brangelina Baby
from Slate:
Is the Brangelina baby better than me?
The only way to answer this is directly and honestly. Tell them: Yes, the Brangelina baby is better than you. But Mommy and Daddy, Grandma and Grandpa all love you very, very much. Less than they love the Brangelina baby, but with as much of their hearts still available.
What it means for you and your family.
By Matt Haber
Posted Friday, May 19, 2006, at 11:08 AM ET
Mommy, what’s the Brangelina baby?
It’s a question no parent is ready to answer, but one that is being asked by younger and younger children. As parents, it’s our job to help them.
Understanding the Warning Signs:
How can parents know if their children aren’t coping well with the Brangelina baby? Stay alert. Monitor your kids’ television viewing, Web surfing, and glossy celebrity-weekly reading habits. Also, look for nonverbal signs: moodiness, anger, silence, anxiety, regression, nightmares, bed-wetting. These may be indicators that your child is struggling with the Brangelina baby.
Common Questions, Compassionate Answers:
Why can’t I be the Brangelina baby? The first thing many kids want to know about the Brangelina baby is, “Why not me?” Research indicates that children as young as 3 months old are sensitive to their own status. And even the dimmest children know that the Brangelina baby is receiving a lot of attention and praise. Older kids might look at the photos of the Brangelina baby and wonder why they were featured on so few magazine covers or news reports at the time of their birth.
Parents should patiently explain that all babies are special. The Brangelina baby might seem like the most important baby in the world, but it wasn’t so long ago that everyone was talking about Violet Affleck, Sean Preston Federline, Apple Martin, or what’s her name, Brian Benben and Madeline Stowe’s kid. Make sure children understand that they are special, too, albeit in a much more narrowcast market sort of way. Not every baby needs to be on the cover of OK!, but if your child feels excluded, experts suggest using computer-imaging software to mock up “pretend” magazine covers featuring your kids. Eye-catching cover lines like, “America’s Favorite Plate Cleaner Comes Clean: ‘I Love Broccoli!’ ” will help stifle any anxiety.
Is the Brangelina baby better than me? The only way to answer this is directly and honestly. Tell them: Yes, the Brangelina baby is better than you. But Mommy and Daddy, Grandma and Grandpa all love you very, very much. Less than they love the Brangelina baby, but with as much of their hearts still available.
I hate the Brangelina baby! You’ll hear this one a lot. While jealousy is a natural feeling for children, parents should discourage outright hatred of the Brangelina baby. If anger persists, impose a short “timeout.” Experts recommend at least two days—no talking, no instant messaging, no blogging.
Can I be friends with the Brangelina baby? No. He/she doesn’t care about you. You cannot even look directly at the Brangelina baby. Explain that photos of the Brangelina baby are shot through special lenses, and that prolonged exposure to the Brangelina baby will make your child go blind.
Making Peace:
By tackling the tough questions with honesty, parents can help kids deal with the Brangelina baby. More than mere acceptance of the Brangelina baby, together you and your child can work toward embracing it and making peace with its dominion over our planet and its cannibalization of our inner lives. Remember, moms and dads: Children, like movie stars, are just like us! With a little TLC they’ll get through this just fine. We all will. It’s what the Brangelina baby would want.
Matt Haber writes for lowculture.com and is co-writing a children’s book about free-market capitalism.
Photograph of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie on the Slate home page © Walter Bieri/epa/Corbis.
Sunday, March 12, 2006
Going Home Barbie
The official “I’ve adopted a Chinese baby” Barbie, available only in Guangzhou at the Swan Hotel.
Evacuee Barbie - Comes in a suitcase with three changes of old clothes,
a box of photographs, and pets.
Rooftop Barbie - Comes with an ax for chopping a hole in her roof, a
flashlight to signal helicopters, and a blue tarp to patch the hole when
she returns.
Red Cross Barbie - Comes with Red Cross uniform her own Red Cross truck
capable of serving 1,000 meals per day.
FEMA Barbie - Comes with laptop computer, cell phone, and plain white
trailer. (Trailer not delivered until 90 days after purchase.)
Going Home Barbie - Comes with haz-mat suit, boots, gloves, respirator
mask, shovel, and bin for holding recovered items.
Looter Barbie - Comes with shotgun, hundreds of gold chains, and
shopping cart filled with electronic equipment. (NOPD Ken, equally o
utfitted, can be purchased separately.)
Food Stamp Barbie - comes with Louisiana Purchase card and pin number.
U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Barbie - comes with blinders on and credit card for lunch
Levee Board Barbie - comes with unused hard hat and pockets lined with cash
Saturday, March 11, 2006
Just desserts
In case you can’t manage to click on the pic:
Liquid Nitrogen Ice Cream/Gelato Base
heidi notes: This is a nice, creamy gelato-type base. Infuse it, add stuff, get creative. I wrote this recipe a few years back - I tend to use arrowroot instead of cornstarch as a thickener in recipes that need it (it is usually less-processed than cornstarch). But because I haven’t tested arrowroot in this base, I’ll give you the cornstarch version. If you use this as a base for liquid nitrogen ice cream, please read up on the safety precautions that must be observed when handling LN2.
4 cups whole organic milk
1 vanilla bean, split
1 cup sugar
3 tablespoons plus 2 teaspoons cornstarch
1 teaspoon vanilla extract
Place three cups of the milk in a saucepan with the vanilla bean over medium-low heat.
Meanwhile, pour the remaining 1 cup milk into a large glass measuring cup. Add the sugar and the cornstarch. Mix well.
When the milk starts to simmer, remove it from the heat and pour in the cornstarch mixture, stirring the whole time. Return the saucepan to medium-low and stir, stir, stir, until things start thickening up, 10 to 12 minutes. It should end up thicker than, say, a runny milkshake, but thinner than a frosty one.
Pour the mixture through a strainer into a mixing bowl, whisk in the vanilla extract, and let it cool on the counter for 20 minutes or so. I like to then chill it in the refrigerator for a few hours or overnight until it is completely chilled.
Now you are ready to place this mixture in a metal-bowl mixer and do the liquid nitrogen thing (see above links and do your safety reading and research first), or you can just freeze this using the manufacturer’s instructions on a standard ice-cream maker.
Serves 6.
Saturday, February 18, 2006
Back when I was young …
If you’re of Baby Boom vintage or younger, you probably take your local supermarket for granted. You walk in, round up the Mr. Clean and Mrs. Butterworth, mince your way through the check stand, and you’re done. But grocery shopping wasn’t always like that. The modern supermarket — technically known as a “self-service food store” — is a fairly recent invention.
Back in the days before laptops … and CostCo … and … actually, the phone that we had in San Francisco was one of those squat-toad black ones with a black-and-white fabric cord, but it was already a really old phone. I’m not sure that I’d want to have to deal with a world without 24-hour access to grocery stores and ATM’s.
The real question, however, is whether I’m the only one that remembers how Old Navy used to wrap their t-shirts in cellophane and styrofoam like they were pieces of meat.
Before World War II, grocery stores were usually very small, narrow affairs, and going shopping amounted to telling a clerk behind a counter exactly what was needed. Since most of the merchandise was also behind the counter, out of reach, the clerk had to assemble the order item by item. Often, he or she had to weigh and package items from bulk, whether coffee, flour or pickles, which didn’t speed things up any.
But slow service wasn’t the reason traditional full-service grocery stores began to die out in the late 1930s. Rather, rising labor costs and a boom in mass-produced packaged foods drove the rapid changeover to self-service supermarkets. Allowing customers to select their own pre-packed items meant less labor and higher volume, which meant more profit for the grocer.
As quaint as it seems today, the boom in packaged foods stemmed largely from the widespread introduction of cellophane. Compared with paper, the new transparent wrappers kept food fresher while allowing self-service customers to see exactly what they were buying. Cellophane wrappers first appeared on dry goods but quickly spread to baked goods, meats and vegetables.
The quintessential supermarket layout — a central area devoted to dry goods, a produce section along the right side and a meat counter at the rear — also gradually took shape during the early postwar years. Beginning with the fact that people naturally tend to circulate toward the right rather than the left, the various grocery sections were laid out in a deliberate sequence designed to increase sales, with staple foods first, followed by discretionary goodies with higher profit margins.
For the first time, the grocery industry also strove to understand what was going on in a housewife’s mind when she went shopping — and mind you, in those days supermarket customers were almost invariably assumed to be women. “The housewife — her habits, her thinking processes, her frame of mind as she enters the store — should always be given careful consideration,” advised one trade reference of the era. “If the staple groceries are located well back, she will be drawn to the rear of the store. … If the housewife can complete her ‘must’ shopping list (there), so much the better. As the housewife winds her way back to the front door, we want her to see our extras, specials, fancies, and high-margin goods, for now she is in a good mood to consider them.”
This carefully planned path of travel exposed the unwitting shopper to “silent salesmanship” of the kind we still find today: mass displays (items stacked in huge quantity to suggest exceptional value), associated displays (for instance, packaged shortcakes placed alongside fresh strawberries), sale items with two-for-one pricing and of course those check-stand displays designed to encourage the purchase of treats for nagging youngsters.
Today, despite 60-odd years of refinement — most of it having to do with pricing, inventory control and payment — the supermarket remains a distinctly mid-century invention, one that any time-warped GI might recognize. The tough part would be explaining why we’ve now got 10 kinds of orange juice.
Copyright 2006 Arrol Gellner Distributed by Inman News E-mail Arrol Gellner at home@sfchronicle.com.
Friday, January 20, 2006
Coming soon to a town near you
actually, I’m kidding. It’s already there and soon, there will probably be more.
And if you’re in my world, this is a REALLY REALLY big deal.
City Can’t Bar Cell Towers on Looks Only, Court Says
- La Cañada Flintridge’s ban is rejected. Service providers say the ruling will help boost coverage.
In the nation’s first appellate ruling on an increasingly contentious local issue, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals struck down parts of a La Cañada Flintridge law that had allowed the city to withhold building permits on public rights of way for purely aesthetic reasons.
Similar ordinances in cities across California and the nation have slowed efforts by wireless companies to offer better coverage and advanced services they say their 200 million customers demand. Municipal officials counter that they have a responsibility to protect their residents from a proliferation of unsightly infrastructure.
Unlike telephone or cable lines, cellphone transmitters can’t be buried underground and need to be high enough to relay signals without obstruction. And they’re seemingly everywhere. By June, service providers had installed 178,025 cell sites nationwide — adding more than 15,000 a year for the last four years.
“Would you want these things in your backyard?” said La Cañada Flintridge’s appellate lawyer, Scott J. Grossberg.
“The residents didn’t want them. The city didn’t want them. I wouldn’t want them in my backyard.”
La Cañada Flintridge officials have not decided whether they will ask the Supreme Court to review the case, which echoes past efforts of municipalities to regulate other urban eyesores such as tall pole-mounted signs one wag dubbed “litter on a stick.”
The wireless industry cheered the three-judge panel’s unanimous decision, saying it should make it easier for service providers to expand their networks at a time when growth in the number of new cellphone subscribers is slowing. To win customers, cellular companies pitch better reception and new services, such as video and e-mail, which require more towers and antennas.
Cities nationwide have been rejecting tower permits based on aesthetics, prompting some providers to dress up their gear as giant trees or hide them in church steeples to pass visual muster.
The appearance of cellular transmitters varies widely. Some are little more than antennas on top of buildings. Others are massive free-standing poles topped with an array of gear.
Last fall, some residents in the village of Cayuga Heights, N.Y., near Ithaca, formally objected to plans by Verizon Wireless to build a tower, saying the views from their homes would be ruined. In the farmlands northeast of Minneapolis-St. Paul, neighbors of dairy farmer Jeff Vollrath are objecting to a deal he made with Sprint Nextel Corp. to erect a 199-foot tower, complaining about the “ugliness” and the threat to property values as urban sprawl creeps out to them. And in Delaware, residents in Glasgow are fighting a plan to build a 150-foot tower, disguised as a giant cross, at the Good Shepherd Baptist Church.
“Cities are very demonstrative in wanting sites hidden. And minimizing the aesthetic effects is a company goal as well,” said John J. Flynn III, who represented Sprint against La Cañada Flintridge before the appeals court.
“This has been an issue of great importance and intense feelings.”
California, the nation’s biggest telecommunications market, has been particularly problematic for wireless companies, said John Walls, a spokesman for the industry trade group Cellular Telecommunications and Internet Assn.
“We’ve had significant problems with getting towers along major highways in California,” Walls said. “That resistance has been legally diminished by this decision.”
The case began in 2001, when Sprint wanted to upgrade equipment installed on two existing power poles on busy residential streets. La Cañada Flintridge officials approved Sprint permits at two other locations, but the city and the company couldn’t find a compromise on the residential sites.
Cities and wireless providers watched the La Cañada Flintridge case as a test of municipal power.
“Ultimately, cities and service providers knew the courts were going to have to intervene,” Flynn said.
Sprint sued, arguing that state law gave it the right to install its equipment on public rights of way as long as it didn’t affect public use of roads. The city countered that state law granted it the power to regulate the time, place and manner — essentially the aesthetics — of such improvements and that it had a right to ensure public safety.
U.S. District Judge David O. Carter said the city failed to make its case on public safety grounds, but he agreed that La Cañada Flintridge was within its rights to deny Sprint’s permits for aesthetic reasons.
The appellate court disagreed. The judges held that La Cañada Flintridge’s ordinance conflicted with sections of the California Utilities Code, which the court said gave companies “broad authority to construct telephone lines and other fixtures” along public rights of way.
Said La Cañada Flintridge Mayor Anthony Portantino: “This is a pretty important decision on land use and local control. We thought this was a place for reasonable controls.”
Many states have similar utilities laws. Although the decision applies only to California law, lawyers said other courts nationwide would give it weight when considering similar cases.
That, wireless advocates and foes agreed, would probably mean more towers.
Cingular Wireless, Verizon Wireless and Sprint are rushing to install high-speed gear in their networks. And T-Mobile USA, the fourth-largest provider, committed itself last year to an aggressive plan for building its system.
“This is a situation where it really is: When is enough enough?” Grossberg said. “Does everyone have the right to come in and upgrade just because there’s new technology? When will all this stop?”
Tuesday, January 17, 2006
Friday, January 13, 2006
El Pollo Loco
What you get when you combine Avian Flu and Mad Cow?
The mere thought does help reinforce the “I-never-want-to-eat-fast-food-again”. Incidentally …
The Bread Is Famously Good, but It Killed McDonald’s
By IAN FISHER
ALTAMURA, Italy, Jan. 10 - First, an inconvenient truth: This is not a new story. But somehow the tale of how the city with the best bread in Italy forced its McDonald’s out of business never really got told, and is spilling out now.
All the elements of a McDonald’s morality play remain relevant today: perceived corporate arrogance; traditional food triumphing over food product; a David in the form of a humble and graying baker against an expansionist American Goliath.
And, inevitably, it includes the French.
It was the leftist and Amero-skeptic French newspaper Libération that last week wrote the fullest account of what happened in Altamura, in southern Italy, where the road signs rightly welcome visitors to “The City of Bread.”
“The long red mat was taken away secretly during the night,” it reported, noting too that the “enormous M” over Piazza Zanardelli was “also packed up surreptitiously.” The windows were covered “like a shroud on the victim of a culinary battlefield.”
“Today,” the newspaper said, “there are no longer Big Macs, Chicken McNuggets or industrial fries in Altamura.”
What Libération neglected to say, as have most of the other articles in an irresistible landslide of coverage in print and on the Web, is that the McDonald’s closed in December 2002. The paper spoke vaguely of events a “number” of months ago.
But no matter. The protagonists here in Altamura as well as many others are thrilled with the belated attention, and the distinction as the city whose food was so good that it closed down a McDonald’s without really trying.
“What took place was a small war between us and McDonald’s,” said Onofrio Pepe, a retired journalist who founded an association here devoted to local delicacies. “Our bullets were focaccia. And sausage. And bread. It was a peaceful war, without any spilling of blood.”
Mr. Pepe and several like-minded citizens of Altamura, a city of 65,000 residents, made up one wing of the army. They say they fought largely for pride and for their food, which includes a local mushroom called the cardoncello, focaccia, mozzarella and, most of all, a coarse-grain bread famous for millennia around Italy. The bread is protected as unique in European Union regulations, which note that Horace called it, in 37 B.C., “far the best bread to be had, so good that the wise traveler takes a supply of it for his onward journey.”
When the McDonald’s first opened in early 2001, Mr. Pepe said, he was not opposed to it, and even welcomed the 25 or so jobs it created. “In the beginning,” he said, “it seemed like modernization.”
Then the modern seemed to take over: McDonald’s erected the huge arches on a pole near the old town center, jarringly near the 13th century cathedral, beaming yellow neon 24 hours a day (and disturbing, Mr. Pepe said, little falcons that nested in nearby trees).
“It gave the sense of a city being occupied,” he said. “It was considered a sort of challenge. Not a challenge to confront in anger but with a smile. They brought in their products, and we had ours.”
So his group held low-key protests to highlight local food, as another front on the war opened, very much unplanned.
A fourth-generation baker, Luca Digesu, now 35, opened Antica Casa Digesu, a small bakery right next to the McDonald’s. He said he had had no intention of challenging it, but had merely hoped to shake free some customers attracted to the spot by the novelty.
“I was afraid of McDonald’s,” he said in his bakery on Tuesday. “I was afraid we would be completely glossed over. I was afraid no one would even notice us.”
For a while, McDonald’s drew in the customers of Altamura. “In the beginning,” Mr. Digesu said, “McDonald’s was McDonald’s.”
But soon there was a migration of locals who preferred their own version of fast food: hunks of thick focaccia like the dozen that Mr. Digesu was tending in the oven as he spoke. Part of the reason seemed economic: Mr. Digesu said a big slice of focaccia cost the same as a single McDonald’s hamburger. It was also, clearly, preference.
McDonald’s began fighting back, offering school trips to visit the kitchens, free rentals of the restaurant for children’s birthday parties, coupons for children and a television for customers to watch soccer. Nothing seemed to work.
“They’d watch the game, and as soon as it was over go out and get focaccia,” Mr. Pepe said.
Finally, in December 2002, after less than two years in operation, the McDonald’s closed shop, according to the company, for lack of profitability. The huge space is now divided up into a jeans store and a bank. Mr. Digesu smiled broadly when asked how he felt that the Italian news media, which missed the story three years ago, are now hailing him as a modern-day David.
“I like it,” he said. “McDonald’s is big. I am small. Right now it is 1-0.”
The company sees it differently, of course. “In no way is this a defeat for McDonald’s,” contended Mario Resca, president of McDonald’s in Italy, saying he hoped to double the number of McDonald’s here from the current 340. “If anything, I am proud that the local culture is appreciating its local cuisine because this means that McDonald’s has stimulated a healthy competition.”
In the end, it seems there may simply be places in the world where McDonald’s is out of its depth on every front.
The landlord both for McDonald’s and Mr. Digesu happened to be Mr. Digesu’s brother-in-law. The brother-in-law gave Mr. Digesu a good deal on the rent. He did not do so for McDonald’s.
Then there is the local food - cheap and overwhelmingly good - and the people who have eaten it for centuries and consider it as much their tradition as their history. Odd as it might seem in a corporate boardroom, they put no value on a McDonald’s in Altamura.
“The majority couldn’t imagine McDonald’s becoming an integral part of their lives,” said Patrick Girondi, 48, an entrepreneur from Chicago who has lived here for 15 years. “McDonald’s didn’t get beat by a baker. McDonald’s got beat by a culture.”



